This
reboot starts from the beginning. A new British actor, a generic
unknown attractive guy with that, 'I dont know im hot but all the
ladies love me' is Peter Parker. We see our hero from a young age going through the pain of losing
his parents because of what can only be perceived as his fathers ethical
stance on animal- human cross genetics. Considering it all comes out in
the end: 'Wrong decision there bro! Oh well you live and you learn...
Well maybe in your case you don't.' On a total side note: Spidermans dad looked like Harry
Potters dad. I think Hollywood really do have a casting type for dead
dads... Who would have thought?
The film's overall pace was slow. It took an hour for Peter Parker to get all 'spiderfied'
and perform some cool skate boarding acrobatics. The only analogy I could ascribe to it: Imagine having a Ferrari capable of some real vroom vroom but having to drive it in
central london traffic. Whilst people maybe able to appreciate the visual beauty of your car, other than for ego purposes, this is a waste and just cant be that much fun?
The entire theme of the movie is laden with a goody two shoes vibe (I think real reviewers
call this cinematography). I understand it's a hero movie but with such
a predictable vibe, characters that don't have much depth to them, and to
top this is off a very slowly un-ravelling story, this reboot need not
be made.
Spider-man fights off
the lizard dude who is played by Rhys Ifan, who plays a scientist wanting to
grow an arm back, but ends up turning into a crazy psycho part lizard-
part man, you know, as you do. They should totally make convicted beastialist's (Welsh people) watch this
movie. Talking about the Welsh, Rhys Ifan's character is the only one with some actual
depth and intricacy, and I found myself undecided if he was a bad guy with good traits or vice versa.
In the end Spiderman wins (shock horror) but the film is
unashamedly left open for a sequel (shock horror). If you are going to watch this movie regardless of how bad
it is, a definite strong point is that it was a visual masterpiece. The sounds, lighting, subtle 3D,
scenic intricacies were all perfect, it was really beautiful on the eye,
and I'm not just talking about the lead actors.
For all you sympathisers out there with your: 'What do you expect of a hero movie?'
I
have 21 words: Have you seen the Batman reboots , Iron Man 1 or 2, or
even the first two spidermans in the last reboot? Or more succint, in three words:
'Hello!! The Avengers??'
Overall I would argue this was most definitely not 'The Great Spiderman'. The movie had great style but not a lot of substance. 2/5... 3/5 if you dont have a mental age above 14.
It must be really bad if you'be scored it that low ... and I was looking forward to watching it ... oh well thanks in advance :)
ReplyDeletei rated it as about average!
ReplyDelete